Freeholders used to be able to arbitrarily charge for giving their consent in a number of areas that were not covered by statutory leasehold legislation. Leaseholders had been unable to challenge these payments as to their reasonableness. However, under Schedule 11 (s158) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, such charges come under a new legal category, administration charges. Administration charges are not defined in Landlord and Tenant law because they are neither service charges nor ground rent. Additionally, since the 2002 Act came into force it has become possible to levy variable administration charges for breaches of a lease, such as late payment, even if the lease does not specify this.

When advising a leaseholder of an administration charge it is necessary to ensure that the leaseholder also receives a notice of the Tenant’s Rights and Obligations (Administration Charges).


As with the service charges, when the administration charge is variable the fee levied must be reasonable and under s158 of the 2002 Act, leaseholders have the right to ask the First Tier Tribunal whether they are payable. The request can be made before or after payment because the FTT doesn’t presume that simply because the charge has been paid that the issue of reasonableness doesn’t arise. If the Tribunal determines that the charge is payable it may also determine:

  1. Who should pay it;
  2. Who it should be paid to:
  3. The amount;
  4. The date it should be paid by;
  5. How it should be paid.


On the other hand, if the administration charges are fixed, then the only way to challenge them is to apply to the First Tier Tribunal for a lease variation on the grounds that either the calculation formula is unreasonable or the administration charge specified in the lease is unreasonable.


Visitors Online

Visitors online – 107:
users – 1
guests – 79
bots – 27
The maximum number of visits was – 2017-03-31:
all visits – 5594:
users – 8
guests – 1537
bots – 4049
browser – Chrome 41.0.2272.96

%d bloggers like this: