At some point the lease is going to need to be extended (unless it has a term of 999 years) but why? There are a number of answers to this question. As a lease term reduces it becomes more difficult to sell a property. A loss of capital value also occurs in parallel. So an extension will a) reverse the loss of capital value to make the properties far more likely to reach their true market value and b) make them more saleable. Only a peppercorn ground rent will end up having to be paid (usually zero) and any alterations to the property can be noted into the new lease when it is drawn up. An extended lease can also secure funding which would not be possible if the lease only had around 60 unexpired years left on it.
Lease extensions are also one of the 4 areas within a lease that is designed to allow a freeholder to make yet more money after the premium has been paid. If the lease term has fallen beneath 82 years unexpired at this point purchasing of an extension automatically becomes more expensive. This is due to what is termed ‘marriage value’. Lease extensions add value to a property and when ‘married together’ exceed the combined value of them taken separately. Under the 1993 Act, the freeholder landlord is entitled to half of this increased value which can sometimes be a substantial amount. Extending a lease with a remaining term of 82 years or more means no marriage fee is payable.
Lease extensions can be taken at differing times. Some people prefer to wait until they have owned the property for 2 years or more so they can take the statutory extension route of an automatic 90 years added onto the unexpired term. This gives them protection under legislation and time frames for each part of the process. Some buyers want to know if the lease can be extended during the conveyancing process which it can, again provided the seller has owned the property for 2 years or more. In this situation it is the benefit of the right that is assigned through the Deed of Assignment of the Benefit of the Notice. Others prefer instead to try and enter into an informal arrangement with the freeholder but this can be a very risk route to take because there is no protection against it going wrong.